the main reasons of the presence of ads on extremist and fake news sites is the fact that Google removes ads only from pages and not from a whole site. In a post from May 2017, the platform announced that from now on and by default, it will remove ads from pages that violate its policies. It is explicit that is at the page level and not at the site level. Scott Spencer, Google’s sustainable ads director explained:
“As we roll out page-level policy action as the new default for content violations, we’ll be able to stop showing ads on select pages, while leaving ads up on the rest of a site’s good content.”
In concrete terms, a given brand’s ads may have been removed from pages with racist contents on an extremist site but still appear on its weather forecast section, meaning that Google provides revenues to such sites. So it is not a surprise that, in September 2017, 90% of fake news sites which are monetizing their audience through programmatic advertising are using Google Adsense (according to Storyzy statistics). Their audience represents 120M monthly visits.
Since July 2017, Storyzy spotted on these fake news sites more than 600 different brand’s ads including big names such as McDonald’s, Walmart, AT&T, Adobe, Visa, Nespresso, American Express, Verizon, Hertz, Volkswagen, Goodyear, Microsoft, Dell, Toyota…
Google Adsense content policies are clear
Google Adsense policies about ‘dangerous or derogatory content’ are clear and they are applicable at the page level:
“We believe strongly in freedom of expression, but we don’t permit monetization of dangerous or derogatory content.
However, when a brand’s ads appear on specific ‘safe’ pages of an extremist site because they do not violate Google policies, the brand is still funding both the extremist site and Google.
Is Google wrong with its rules at page level?
It is public that Breitbart news has been blacklisted by nearly 2,600 brands that had removed all their campaigns from the site since November 2016(the whole site of Breitbart and not only questionable pages). Not all content on this site is extremist, racist or false information. They removed their ads despite the fact they could appear close to articles from respectable agencies like Associated Press. For example, in the picture below you can see an AP article on Breitbart that has been blacklisted by these brands.